Comparison of CMS systems
Here is a small comparison of new, but also well-known CMS systems in key points.
Typo 3
- Recommended only for larger sites.
- Well-suited for complex tasks.
- Sometimes problems in meeting Webstandarts.
- Almost unlimited expansion possibilities.
- Very good user-friendliness.
- No Problem with the creation of multilingual websites.
Textpattern
- No particular comfortable CMS system.
- Very high flexibility.
- Number of interesting features.
- Creation of multilingual Websites is difficult.
- Rather recommend for smaller Websites.
Redaxo
- Easy installation and use.
- Very flexible and easily scaled.
- Creation of multilingual websites without any problem.
- Difficult law administration because of the confusing rights assignment.
- Numerous expansion possibilities.
- Sometimes shortcomings in the performance.
Drupal
- Very high speed and performance.
- Installation experts only.
- Managing multiple sites with only 1 installation.
- Numerous expansion possibilities.
- Not very user-friendly.
- Restricted rights management.
- For smaller but also larger sites.
CMS made simple
- Very high flexibility and ease use.
- Easy installation, configuration and administration.
- Suitable small to medium sized websites.
- Multilingual sites limited.
- Performance could be improved, but it’s ok.
Drow CMS 5 Professional
- User-friendly management interface.
- High system stability, and functionality.
- Easy administration management. (Any number of users)
- Integrated WYSIWYG editor.
- Itegrated Web-statistics.
- Very friendly search engine.
- A variety of optional modules. (Blogs, communities, etc.)
Source: Drow.de, barrierekompass.de
Tags: CMS, CMS made simple, comparison, Drow CMS, Drupal, Redaxo, Textpattern, Typo 3
